This is an almost
embarrassing admission to my bad reading habits: if I get into one author, I'll
abandon anything else I'm doing and I'll read All the Books. Gone Girl was a maddening novel, and I didn't
want to stop feeling infuriated at the characters--so I bought Dark Places straight away and read it in the
next couple of days. I couldn't begin this entry with a quote from the book or a picture of my actual copy (although you can see it resting under the Jeeves book in the previous entry) because I already gave it to a friend to read. Apparently, not only did I read
all of Flynn's novels within a couple of weeks, but I became a Flynn
spokesperson overnight.
This binge reading
also proved to me that it's a stupid idea to read everything from one author in
one sitting. I wanted Dark Places to
give me exactly the same as Gone Girl
did, and when it happened, I was disappointed: what, is Flynn some one trick
pony? Totally unfair toward the author.
The one trick is
this: both Dark Places and Gone Girl use the same style of narration. We
have multiple narrators or view points, and we also have one narrator in the
present tense, and another in the past. Both of them are, in their own way,
leading up to an event: a murder. In Dark Places, it's a heinous massacre that a sister is attempting to solve
years later, while her brother is serving time for murdering her other siblings
and mother in some Satanic ritual. The present is attempting to find out who
really did it, whereas the past is hurtling inevitably toward the murder, with
a countdown ticking. And we the readers
simply do not know what to believe. I'm so smitten with this style of narrative
and the unreliability of the narrators, but at the same time, I wish I had
either read Sharp Objects first, or put
some more time between these books. I probably would have appreciated Dark Places much more that way, instead of now
having this feeling of didn't we just do this
thing? The thing I love so much!
Still, Dark Places is not a copy of Gone Girl. Dark Places is about good people who get into a really bad mess or hang out with the wrong
crowd, at a time when small towns believed that any teenager wearing black was
sacrificing babies to Satan in the woods. In Gone
Girl, you just kind of hate everyone, and it's so satisfying to hate
them, whereas in Dark Places you are
worried about how small town mentality, mass hysteria, and rumors can ruin
people.
They are both about
evil incarnations, but in different ways. Fear not; there's blood in both of them.
So where I 'enjoyed' the suspense with Gone Girl - I just hated this book. I wanted to finish it - but I did hate the book. My experience with both books was thru audiobook. With Gone Girl - I had to hold myself back - almost to savor the crazy book - with Dark Places - I had to hit stop many times - just couldn't take anymore ! I listened the book typically during my walk/run. I think book is well written and anyone who enjoys dark books enjoys this - and I'm sure there is a movie coming too - this can be a real scary movie if they figure out how to master the different roles in book.
ReplyDeleteThis may be the end for me to Gillian Flynn's books....too scary !
Maybe this book got too much on me ! So I did read it all the way to the end, just too scary for me !
DeleteI can't imagine listening to a horror story on my walks--might be a bit too much for me, too! I take it you might not read Sharp Objects, then. ;)
DeleteJenni - I hope my message did not come thru wrong (?) - as a book and story line - I think it was very good (I would not have finished it otherwise) - but for this kind of chicken (me) - it was a lot to LISTEN ! :)
ReplyDeleteNo worries, I understood. :) Although I liked American Psycho (or can anyone really like it?), I had to skip some sections because they were just too scary/gory to me. Ya'll know the rat scene I'm talking about.
Delete